Loading...
Product engineering software · safety-critical systems

One requirement.
One unbroken thread of evidence.

PES keeps requirements, traceability, reviews, and validation evidence connected end to end — so certification programs stop rebuilding proof by hand and start shipping it.

DO-178C ARP4754A ARP4761 DO-330 aware DAL A–E
REQ-1042 · TRACE VIEW DAL B
System Requirement SYS-0087 · baselined Software Requirement REQ-1042 · reviewed Design Element SDD-0312 PR/CR Impact CR-0119 · flagged Code Module nav_filter.c Test Case TC-0391 Validation Evidence pending Audit Baseline BL-2026.3
The problem, and the thread that solves it

Where programs lose time — and how PES closes the gap

Every finding on the left is a familiar audit symptom of evidence living in disconnected spreadsheets. On the right, the PES capability that removes it — one continuous thread instead of many.

The cost of manual process

The same checks, repeated by hand, every cycle

Each requirement is manually checked against its upstream requirements, checklists, and standards — review after review. It's slow, and the result depends on who happens to be reviewing.

Impact paths are guessed, not shown

When a requirement changes, tracing its effect across system, software, design, and test layers becomes archaeology instead of a lookup.

F-03 · PR/CR management complexity

Change authorization has no single record

Requirement edits and their approvals live in email threads and change logs that don't talk to each other — audit trails get rebuilt after the fact.

F-04 · Validation prepared too late

Evidence is assembled, not maintained

Test evidence and audit readiness get compiled the week before a milestone, instead of accumulating continuously as work happens.

F-05 · No requirement engineering, no AI assistance

Current tools manage requirements — they don't engineer them

Mainstream tools store, track, and manage requirements, but offer no real requirement engineering — and no AI-driven assistance for drafting, decomposition, quality review, or improvement built into the workflow.

PES capability pipeline
PES-01

Requirement Engineering

Decompose, import, and review engineering requirements against controlled baselines — with history that survives every revision.

Explore capability →
PES-02

Traceability & Impact Analysis

Track upstream and downstream relationships across system, software, design, and test artifacts in one view.

Explore capability →
PES-03

PR/CR & Review Management

Authorize edits, review downstream impact, and keep every change decision auditable from request to resolution.

Explore capability →
PES-04

AI-Assisted Self-Review

Configurable quality profiles flag ambiguity and gaps before a requirement ever reaches a formal review cycle.

Explore capability →
PES-05

Test Case Generation

Generate validation-oriented test cases directly from structured requirements and their trace context.

Explore capability →
PES-06

Baseline & Audit Readiness

Maintain review evidence, version history, and lifecycle records so audit readiness is a standing state, not a scramble.

Explore capability →
Built by engineers, not just developers

We've sat on the other side of the audit table.

PES is built by engineers with hands-on DO-178C and ARP4754A/ARP4761 background — not a generic project tracker retrofitted for compliance.

About Samhita Engineering →

Ready to put your certification evidence on one thread?

Request PES demo/discussion →